From 8e4bff4cab0ddac6060645b0715210484d02ff40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuval Adam <_@yuv.al>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 08:25:59 +0000
Subject: Initial file dump from open source release

---
 net/ax25/TODO | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 net/ax25/TODO

(limited to 'net/ax25/TODO')

diff --git a/net/ax25/TODO b/net/ax25/TODO
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..69fb4e36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/ax25/TODO
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Do the ax25_list_lock, ax25_dev_lock, linkfail_lockreally, ax25_frag_lock and
+listen_lock have to be bh-safe?
+
+Do the netrom and rose locks have to be bh-safe?
+
+A device might be deleted after lookup in the SIOCADDRT ioctl but before it's
+being used.
+
+Routes to a device being taken down might be deleted by ax25_rt_device_down
+but added by somebody else before the device has been deleted fully.
+
+The ax25_rt_find_route synopsys is pervert but I somehow had to deal with
+the race caused by the static variable in it's previous implementation.
+
+Implement proper socket locking in netrom and rose.
+
+Check socket locking when ax25_rcv is sending to raw sockets.  In particular
+ax25_send_to_raw() seems fishy.  Heck - ax25_rcv is fishy.
+
+Handle XID and TEST frames properly.
-- 
cgit v1.3.1